Transformational leader vs. transactional leader

In order to accept or reject the statement “Do you see your choice as transformational leader vs. transactional leader in line with the above statements by William and Susan Bridges?”, one has to study in details. Transformational leaders encourage others to perform better than they originally planned and frequently even better than they considered potential. Such leaders set more demanding expectations and classically attain higher performances.

According to Bridges (2000) transformational leadership is an opening out of transactional leadership while transactional leadership highlights the transaction or exchange that takes place among leaders, colleagues, and followers. This exchange is founded on the leader conversing with others what is essential and identifying the conditions and rewards these others will obtain if they accomplish the necessities. Proper transformational leaders lift the level of moral development of those whom they lead.

They convert their followers into leaders. They expand and enlarge the wellbeing of those whom they lead. They encourage their associates, colleagues, followers, customers, and even their bosses to go further than their personal self-interests for the good of the group, organization, or society. Transformational leaders concentrate on each follower’s intellect of self-worth in order to engage the follower in true dedication and contribution in the endeavor at hand. This is one of the things that transformational leadership inserts to the transactional exchange. Transformational leadership is more effectual than transactional leadership in producing the additional attempt, pledge, and contentment of those led.

Transformational leaders perform better with colleagues and followers than set up effortless exchanges. They act in manners to attain higher outcomes by employing one or more of the four components of transformational leadership. First, leadership is viewed through rose-tinted glasses when followers search to recognize with their leaders and imitate them. Second, the leadership motivates the followers with confront and influence that present connotation and understanding.

Third, the leadership is rationally inspiring, expanding the followers’ use of their capabilities. Lastly, the leadership is independently caring, providing the followers with facilitation, mentoring, and coaching. Transactional leadership takes place when the leader rewards a follower based on the competence of the follower’s recital. Transactional leadership depends on dependent underpinning, either optimistic reliant reward or the more unenthusiastic active or passive shapes of management-by-exception. (Bridges, 2000)

It is concluded that transformational leadership supports to transactional leadership in its effects on follower contentment and recital. Transformational leadership does not substitute transactional leadership. That is, productive and in particular remedial connections may have only minor impact on followers unless accompanied by one or more components of transformational leadership for getting the most out of transactions. Hence the statement is accepted.
References

Bridges, William, and Susan Mitchell Bridges “Leading Transition: A New Model for C