Geothermal Energy Critique Essay

Geothermal energy is one of energy source types. Geothermal is energy that is gotten from deep of the earth and close parts of the magma with hotwater and its vapour. It is claimed that is useful and practically energy. Geothermal energy sources are argued that is better than other types in variety topics. Despite the fact that geothermal energy have various advantages ; cost, location problems and safety should be considerably reasons which are not geothermal energy prefferring.

It has been argued that geothermal energy sources have low cost but geothermal energy, owing to this circumstance, has less decreased profit than other sources. Geothermal energy sources are claimed that has low cost. Putatunda claims that geothermal energy doesn’t require a alternative source such as coal and oil. Besides, this energy type doesn’t need a structure or a investigation. However, geothermal energy, despite its low cost, hasn’t enough profit.

Swain said that ‘Sometimes the locations may temporarily run out of steam for mounths, so the power plant will not have enough energy to generate electricity,’(2007). In short, cost of geothermal energy is lower than other energy sources , but its profit is considerably the lowest. Some claimed that because of the fact that geothermal energy doesn’t require a structure, this energy type hasn’t location problem, but geothermal energy systems are based on only suitable locations.

Putatunda claims that this energy type doesn’t need a build, which is gathering power such as windmill or solar system, to generate electricity or warm. Nevertheless, geothermal energy systems are constructed specific regions. Swain claims that geothermal energy systems are builded suitable areas which have too low quantity(2007). Moreover, this areas is not appropriate to remove sources. Swain states ‘Oftentimes the source of heat is far too deep for this method very well,’(2007). In brief, geothermal energy is remarkably unproductive compared to another.

Some argued that geothermal energy is not detrimental for environment and beings, but this energy type have variety risks. People who defended geothermal energy claims this energy type is safety way to generate power. Because there are no harmful chemicals. Putatunda states that although different energy sources like dams and nuclear energy are harmful for nature, geothermal power is not as effective as them Nonetheless, geothermal energy has several serious damage. Dean states when geothermal energy sources is got, poisonous gases emerge (2009). Furthermore, it leads to earthquake.

As stated in New York Times, recently two parallel plans about geothermal energy occured worries in safety this sources about causing earthquake (2009). To sum up, geothermal energy significantly has deleterious for nature and beings. To draw a conclusion, according to these steps, geothermal energy , owing to their all advantages, is not preffered. Because of these all reasons, geothermal energy is not best solution to solve energy problem. That’s why it should not be widespread. As a result, cost , location problems and safety are negative properties for geothermal energy sources.