Assignment : budget and balanced scorecards

Table of contents

Assignment : budget and balanced scorecards

Behavioural problems associated with budgets in this firm

Although we can comment upon this firm’s budget-related problems based on the Production  Manager’s view of the process alone, three things are immediately clear :

  • The firm’s budgetary process is traditional and hierarchical, with departments having separate sub-budgets. In addition, the performance management system appears to be linked to individual performance based on meeting budgetary criteria.
  • There is a significant degree of internal dissatisfaction both about the management accounting system as well as the performance reward criteria.
  • There is also a lack of co-ordination between workers at different levels when it comes to planning their workflow based on the budget at hand – budgeting here is solely a management control system, without any active co-operation from those further down the hierarchy.

The behavioural problems associates with budgets in this firm therefore are:

1. Lack of a ‘fixed’ nature producing poor motivation  : French (1965) stated that the existence of a fixed budget motivates performance, as workers have a defined goal to work towards. In this firm, the budget of the production department is constantly shifting as a result of changes in the operational goals of its related departments. The production manager is understandably quite upset and de-motivated as he believes his own performance can never be judged on his own, as it is largely dependant on goals set by others. As a result of sales going beyond the projected budget for the company, production budgets are also necessarily shifted, which paradoxically means he is ‘overspending’ and hence ‘underperforming’.  Drucker (1954) also was an advocate of  setting clear, tangible, verifiable, measurable goals in order to motivate, rather than to “control”, people. In this firm, clearly, budget is more of a controlling tool, which is responsible for the poor motivation levels.

    One of the most popular theories of motivation according to Reid (2002) that is relevant to this firm is the expectancy theory, where a worker’s motivation to work is affected by a wide range of both independent and interdependent variables (satisfaction associated with the job itself; satisfaction associated with the achievement of objectives; satisfaction with extrinsic rewards associated with the meeting of targets; and the individual’s perceived expectancy of linked reward). Clearly, for our production manager the situation is not conducive at all for staying motivated.

    Stedry (1960) has however argued for different budgets within an organization, for different purposes. While having different budgets for planning and another for motivation can reduce some of the  dissatisfaction in this situation, it has generally been criticized as a bad practice for sending out ‘mixed signals’ to the workers. Given that this was promulgated long before the era of ‘open’ participative management, such a solution is inappropriate for all firms at present. Another solution is necessary.

2. Poor participation and pseudo-participation in the budgetary process : The level of participation appears to be extremely poor in this firm too. ‘Participation’, as defined by Drury (1992) is “the extent to which managers are able to influence the figures that make the budget”. In our study case, the total lack of any participation in the budgetary process has resulted in the situation described as : “Then, as deadlines got tighter and tighter, they just rebelled and relaxed when I wasn’t watching. But I can’t keep watching them all day otherwise who’s going to do the budget?”

  In the case of our production manager, although he is ‘supposed to be managing’ his departmental budget, in essence he is being forced to pseudo-participate in his company’s strategy of using budgets as a management control and performance evaluation tool.  Argyris (1953) found that workers react adversely to budgets where there is pseudo-participation. The hostility that our production manager has encountered from his staff in implementing ‘budgets’ is largely due to the fact that the workers know very well that their department (production) was the victim of ‘pseudo participation’ – and they would be forced to work on  progressively tighter schedules over which their ‘departmental’ manager had absolutely no control.

  As a direct result of this, their department’s performance evaluation was always likely to remain ‘unsatisfactory’, with little prospect of bonuses and rewards.  Hostility and poor motivation was a direct result of these two factors.

Issues of Reward management arising out of the balanced scorecard system

There is little doubt that as a result of changes in the recent decades in the competitive business environment, budgeting is considered by most managers as an outdated ‘financial’ tool in many respects. As shown in our current study, it is seriously hampering productivity amongst workers by the Production manager’s own admission.

  One of the chief benefits of the Balanced Scorecard system, which makes our Production Manager so optimistic about its ‘reward management’ potential is that it utilizes a host of non-financial measures to evaluate performance. One of the chief advantages of this approach, which is relevant to our example, as cited by Kaplan and Norton (1992) is that by breaking down strategic measures towards lower levels, unit managers, operators, and employees can see what’s required at their level to achieve excellent overall performance.

  Balanced Scorecard makes use of all four perspectives that are linked to each other as well as to the strategy of the organisation:

  • Financial perspective
  • Customer perspective
  • Internal Business perspective
  • Learning and Growth perspective

Coming back to the example of our production unit, the fact that for the last few years it has ‘silently’ provided the infrastructure that has enabled the company to sell well ahead of its projections, has finally got a chance to be ‘rewarded’. In the absence of tight departmental budgets, the ‘financial’ perspective becomes organization wide and not just the function of the sales or finance department.

Since the focus is now companywide, it helps to communicate strategy to individuals and departments, thus reducing much of the dissatisfaction and lack of goal congruence seen with the budgeting system. More importantly for our production manger, it prevents improvements being made in one area at the expense of another. Once the pseudo-participation alluded to earlier gets replaced by a organization-wide participation based on common goals, motivation is likely to improve significantly.

The effects of these changes on the company’s reward management policy and structure would be profound.  Performance evaluation would be on the basis of one’s effectiveness within the framework of the whole organization, forcing rethinking about the identification of critical success factors for evaluating performance. In addition, performance would be something that the senior managers are expected to develop and encourage among all levels of staff – bringing in a blame-fee culture; as their own effectiveness in managing teams depends on this.

And because the focus of the organization’s ‘reward policy’ in this environment must be to  reward those individuals and departments which provide the best internal  support to its product/marketing strategy,  our production department and its  manager should finally be able to get their true recognition and reward.

The parameters of the balanced sore card system take time to be fully adopted, but provides an excellent opportunity to provide the much-needed re-structuring that the firm needs.

References

Argyris, C. (1953) Executive Leadership: An Appraisal of a Manager in Action, New York: Harper Brothers.

Drucker, P.F. (1954), The Practice of Management, Harper and Row, New York, NY, .

Drury, C. (1992), Management and Cost Accounting, 3rd ed., Chapman ; Hall, London,

French, J.R.P., Kay, E., Meyer, H. (1965), “Split roles in performance appraisal”,  Harvard Business Review, pp.123-9.

R. Kaplan, D. Norton, (1992).The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review 70 (1)

Reid P (2002) A critical evaluation of the effect of participation in budget target settingon motivation.  Managerial Auditing Journal; Volume: 17   Issue: 3; 2002

Stedry, A.C. (1960), Budget Control and Cost Behaviour, Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with MyStudyWriters
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Business and administrative studies
looks good thank you
Customer 452773, March 3rd, 2023
Psychology
Thank you!
Customer 452545, February 6th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
Perfect
Customer 452773, February 23rd, 2023
Data 564
excellent work
Customer 452773, April 11th, 2024
Business and administrative studies
Thank you for your hard work
Customer 452773, October 19th, 2023
Business Studies
Thank you very much for a good job done and a quick turn around time.
Customer 452615, March 31st, 2021
Leadership Studies
excellent job as always
Customer 452773, September 2nd, 2023
Business and administrative studies
excellent job! got an A, thank you
Customer 452773, May 24th, 2023
Nursing
thank you so much
Customer 452749, June 10th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
excellent job
Customer 452773, March 12th, 2023
BUSINESS LAW
excellent job made a 93
Customer 452773, March 22nd, 2023
Leadership Studies
excellent job
Customer 452773, July 28th, 2023
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Close

Sometimes it is hard to do all the work on your own

Let us help you get a good grade on your paper. Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses. Let us handle your;

  • Dissertations and Thesis
  • Essays
  • All Assignments

  • Research papers
  • Terms Papers
  • Online Classes
Live ChatWhatsApp