It was October 1, 2021, and Grace Pratt, the supply manager of tooling and subcontract material…

It was October 1, 2021, and Grace Pratt, the supply manager of tooling and subcontract material for the Great Gear Manufacturing Company, received a routine rejection notice from the inspection department. This notified her that forty-two worm gears, which had recently been received from the Quick Tool Company, had been rejected. There were two reasons for the rejection. First, the 1 1/4-inch-diameter holes had a rough finish on the bore. Second, the magnaflux mark was not clearly legible on all the pieces. Before Pratt had a chance to go to the receiving department to examine the pieces, she received a telephone call from the production superintendent demanding immediate replacement of the parts because they were holding up the shipment of a substantial spare parts order. The parts were needed for a foreign shipment.
As soon as she got a chance, Pratt went to the receiving department and examined the worm gears. She called to the attention of the chief inspector the fact that there was no notation on the drawing calling for any finish on the bore of the three holes. This dimension called for an extremely tight tolerance of 0.0005 inch. All the parts met this requirement when measured with an inside micrometer. However, she could see that the inside surface of these holes was slightly rough from the boring operation. Pratt did not feel that this roughness was adequate grounds for rejection; however, she suggested that the inspector call the engineer responsible for the part to see if it would be possible to use the part.
A meeting was quickly arranged with the engineer (via a Zoom meeting due to pandemic precautions), who took one look at the worms and said that they were absolutely unsuitable for use. The dimension she objected to was a bearing seat. The engineer said that she could not afford to take a chance on a fit that could become loose in service. She felt that any respectable supplier would produce a smooth surface on this type of hole without any notification on the drawing. She felt that the rough surface showed inferior workmanship. The engineer refused to accept the parts as they were and suggested that the supplier prepare new ones with a ground finish on the bores. Pratt asked the engineer to add a suitable finish indication on the drawing, so the supplier would know exactly what finish was required. This indication would give the inspection department a definite standard for inspection. The request was refused because the engineer felt that any good subcontractor would immediately identify the holes as bearing seats and would produce a 64-micro-inch finish without any special note. Moreover, these parts had been in production for several years and she had never experienced this trouble before; the engineer felt that a new supplier was causing the trouble.
Grace Pratt scheduled a Zoom call to Mr. Fast of the Quick Tool Company and described the situation to him. Mr. Fast objected strenuously to the rejection based on the rough finish. He said that he had been furnished a plug gauge to check this dimension and that the parts had all been checked satisfactorily with this gauge before they had been shipped. Nothing had ever been said to Mr. Fast about the necessity for a ground finish on the bores. Since the holes were already at the proper dimension, it would be impossible to grind them further to salvage the 42 units without an expensive chrome plating operation. Mr. Fast agreed to change his procedure in the future, so that these holes would have a ground finish. The fixture
for this operation would cost at least $20,000, and Fast felt that he would probably have to spend about $55 a unit for additional labor in the grinding operations.
In regard to the magnaflux marking, Mr. Fast pointed out that the marking stamp had been furnished by the Great Gear Company and that the drawing called for it to be applied to a curved surface. Mr. Fast agreed that it was not very legible, but said that it was the best they could do under the circumstances without damaging the stamp.
Mr. Fast said that he was able to make the new grinding operation effective on 90 pieces that were in process and thought that he could deliver these within a week.
The Quick Tool Company was a major supplier of production tooling, particularly dies, jigs, and fixtures. The two companies had had a very favorable relationship starting in 2015. Mr. Fast called on Ms. Pratt about once a week in regard to the many items of tooling which were on order, and the two had come to know each other very well. Quick Tool had done very little production work for Pratt, but its precision work on tooling had always been well done and it had a very good delivery and quality record.
The worm gear had become active at the time of the introduction of the Great Gear offset press. It had been necessary to subcontract this item because no facilities were available internally. At that time, the drawings, specifications, and gauges were furnished to the original subcontractor, the Pratt Automatic Machine Company. Pratt had built the original tooling. When Great Gear had dropped this press from the product line, the part had become inactive. A demand had only recently occurred for spare parts. Pratt had found that Pratt had virtually gone out of business on subcontract precision work. In fact, she had had considerable difficulty in getting the original gauges and tooling back from the Pratt Company. Quick had quoted based on tooling to be furnished, but when the tools had been received from Pratt, they were found to be in very poor condition. In fact, some of the tooling had not been modified to bring it up to the marked revision of the drawing. It had been necessary for Mr. Fast to spend over $150,000 in repairing the tooling before he could use it.
Grace Pratt was puzzled as to the action she should take. She did not think it would be completely fair to Quick to reject the forty-two units, because she felt that Great Gear Manufacturing Company had some responsibility for the loss. She also knew that Mr. Fast had spent considerably more than he had anticipated on being adequately tooled for the job. She was debating in her own mind the advisability of permitting Mr. Fast to raise the price to compensate him for this change in circumstances.

1. From the concepts explained in Chapter 4, what type of relationship do you now have with Quick? What relationship do you want to have?

Types of relationship to choose from: Transactional, Collaborative , or Supply Alliance
2. What steps are needed to work towards this relationship goal?
3. What do you think would be an equitable solution to the problem?

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with My Study Writers
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Nursing
thank you so much
Customer 452749, June 10th, 2021
Management
It's the second time I use this service and it does not let me down. Work quality is so good for its price!
Customer 452985, December 3rd, 2021
IT, Web
Awesome paper in such a short amount of time. Was in a jam with another service who didn't deliver, but Theresa did the job correctly. I will use her again to do my essays for sure!
Customer 452967, November 27th, 2021
Humanities
Thank youuuu
Customer 452729, May 30th, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Always great! My son has been in critical health these last few semesters. Many times I have thought he wasn't going to make it and thought about quitting or postponing school until he was healthier but it always happens to be in the middle of the semester. This service has been a lifesaver for my mindset in helping keep my grades up and keep my son alive at the same time. I don't know if I could have made it through this period without it.
Customer 453077, June 6th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
excellent
Customer 453201, November 8th, 2022
Communications
Thank you so much for your attention to this assignment and timeliness.
Customer 453111, November 12th, 2022
Psychology
Great paper, Thank you so much.
Customer 453209, October 4th, 2022
Accounting
Looks amazing!
Customer 453283, September 2nd, 2022
Social Sciences
Very fast report with excellent information on the topic. Thank you for your speedy service in such a short time.
Customer 453213, June 15th, 2022
Criminal Justice
This has been the greatest help while I am recovering from an illness. Thank your team so much.
Customer 452671, May 2nd, 2021
Management
Love this writer!!! Great work
Customer 452597, April 5th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live ChatWhatsApp