Assessment Description Security professionals need to understand that compliance, along with strong security policies, can make organizational security stronger, but not completely hacker-proof. In 50

Assessment Description

Security professionals need to understand that compliance, along with strong security policies, can make organizational security stronger, but not completely hacker-proof.

In 500-750 words, explain how compliance with governing standards can fail to provide security even when using the Diamond Model of Intrusion Analysis or Cyber Kill Chain model. Where does the use of the model’s tools (e.g., relating to HIPAA, DOD, etc.) still make an organization vulnerable even though the organization is compliant with industry regulations and standards?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information  

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 

MS Cybersecurity

MS Information Assurance and Cybersecurity

3.2: Analyze various cyber threat models used to identify and protect against cybercrime threat vectors, motivations, and ideologies.

Much USe this Matrix

Benchmark – Attack Vectors Models – RubricCollapse AllGoverning Standards Compliance (B)70 pointsCriteria Description

Governing Standards Compliance (C3.2)

5. Target70 points

The student thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates cyber threat models (tools) effectiveness to provide security while being compliant with industry regulations and standards. The student draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. The student not only formulates a clear example, but also acknowledges objections and rival positions.

4. Acceptable59.5 points

The student clearly assesses cyber threat models (tools) effectiveness to provide security while being compliant with industry regulations and standards. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. The student presents supporting evidence.

3. Approaching52.5 points

A surface-level explanation of the cyber threat models (tools) effectiveness to provide security while being compliant with industry regulations and standards is offered. The student presents several supporting details.

2. Insufficient45.5 points

The student ignores or superficially explains the cyber threat models (tools) effectiveness to provide security while being compliant with industry regulations and standards. The student draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions, and presents minimal supporting details.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Analysis of the cyber threat models (tools) effectiveness to provide security while being compliant with industry regulations and standards is not outlined or outlined poorly. The student fails to present supporting details.

Format/Documentation10 pointsCriteria Description

Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target10 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable8.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching7.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient6.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Argument Logic and Construction10 pointsCriteria Description

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.

5. Target10 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Acceptable8.5 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Approaching7.5 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Insufficient6.5 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Language Use and Audience Awareness5 pointsCriteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Target5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Acceptable4.25 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Approaching3.75 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Insufficient3.25 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing5 pointsCriteria Description

Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable4.25 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching3.75 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with My Study Writers
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Business Studies
Thank you very much for a good job done and a quick turn around time.
Customer 452615, March 31st, 2021
Nursing
It was a very long paper, but she followed all the instructions, and she even finished the paper 5 days before the due date. Will write an essay with her again, thanks!
Customer 452967, November 27th, 2021
Emergency Management
Overall, I think it's a great service. I have yet to submit the assignment, so I don't know what kind of grade I'll get. But customer service was excellent. Reviews were made and the assignment proofed for satisfaction.
Customer 453015, December 15th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you
Customer 453087, March 5th, 2022
Criminal Justice
This has been the greatest help while I am recovering from an illness. Thank your team so much.
Customer 452671, May 2nd, 2021
Professions and Applied Sciences
Thanks. This helps a lot. Was a bit late but some cushion was given.
Customer 453015, February 10th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Although it took 2 revisions I am satisfied but I did receive it late because of that.
Customer 452603, March 25th, 2021
Business Studies
First of all, the writer made sure that he completely understood my assignment and all the guidelines before he began writing. My paper was finished very fast and well before the specified deadline. I thought it was written excellently. He definitely completely grasped the topic. Overall, he is a great writer and I couldn't have asked for better.
Customer 452441, November 29th, 2021
Psychology
thank you!
Customer 452947, October 21st, 2021
Other
I am beyond eager to write this review for this writer. I received a grade of "Mastered"upon first submission on this assignment. I will shout to the rooftops ENCOURAGING you to hire him. I have used other writers but NONE have delivered such awesome work as this writer and NONE of their prices can compare to his. He does not try to "break the bank" and he works hard; it shows in the final paper and the grade. He is simply,THE BEST HERE!!
Customer 452995, November 16th, 2021
Business Management
Awesome job, Thank you
Customer 453201, June 12th, 2022
History
Thank you. No issues
Customer 453139, April 17th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live ChatWhatsApp